Forensic Psychology
Why methodological transparency matters as much as the expert's substantive conclusion.
Forensic psychological expertise differs from consultative psychological work primarily in its requirements for methodological transparency and reproducibility. An expert conclusion must be understandable not only to specialists but to the court, which is not required to hold psychological training.
The FAME methodology structures an expert conclusion around four sequential elements:
This structure protects both the specialist and the parties to the proceedings: the conclusion becomes verifiable rather than resting on the expert's authority alone. This is especially important in cases where a psychological assessment can significantly influence the court's decision.
All examples and cases presented within this direction are anonymized and intended solely for educational purposes.